Criminal Defense Case Results in Austin, TX

Charge

Theft

Location

Williamson County, None

Allegations

The client was charged with theft in Williamson County after a reported property incident. We gathered the police reports and discovery and methodically tested the evidence against each required element. In meetings with the prosecutor, we questioned whether the state could prove knowing appropriation or intent beyond a reasonable doubt. We set the matter on a contested track and prepared motions to address evidentiary issues. The state dismissed the case.

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Bell County, CC3

Allegations

After a stop for speeding, the client admitted to drinking and was arrested for DWI. Due to significant leg injuries and the use of crutches, only the HGN eye test was attempted. There was no breath test and no blood draw. We gathered documentation of the injuries and scrutinized the officer’s report, emphasizing the lack of standardized field tests and any chemical evidence. We challenged whether those limited observations could meet the burden of proof. The prosecution dismissed the case.

Charge

DWI - Second Offense

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

After an evening out, our client was stopped following an improper turn at a traffic signal and arrested for a second DWI. They completed field sobriety tests, and a breath test taken later registered just above the legal limit. We obtained the dash and bodycam video and showed that the officer's report overstated impairment and did not align with what the footage revealed. The client also was not wearing prescribed glasses, a factor that can affect those tests. We pressed the state on these issues and negotiated a reduction to a lesser charge, avoiding second-offense penalties.

Charge

Interference with Public Duties

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law #1

Allegations

During a service attempt at a residence, a dispute escalated and someone called police. Responding officers issued conflicting orders, then arrested the client for interference when the client questioned what to do and tried to explain their role. We obtained bodycam and client-shot video showing mixed commands and no effort to hinder the investigation. We compiled these inconsistencies and challenged whether the elements of the offense were met. The prosecutor dismissed the case.

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Hays County, 428th District Court

Allegations

The client was on felony deferred probation when a traffic stop for an equipment issue led to new drug allegations, which the state cited to seek revocation. We closely reviewed the probation terms and the claimed violations, focusing on the legality of the stop and whether consent to search was actually given. We gathered documentation of treatment efforts and meeting attendance to demonstrate progress and compliance. After we highlighted these issues in negotiations, the prosecution dismissed the motion.

Charge

Misdemeanor Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Williamson County, CCL2

Allegations

Probation filed to revoke after the client missed required check-ins and the ignition interlock showed a period of inactivity while the client was in inpatient mental health treatment. A warrant issued and a hearing was set. We collected hospital and rehab records, discharge summaries, and proof of ongoing counseling, then verified the timeline against supervision logs and device data. We met with the prosecutor to explain the circumstances and the absence of new offenses, and prepared to argue for continuation of supervision. The state agreed revocation was not warranted, and the motion was dismissed.

Charge

Assault Causing Bodily Injury to a Family Member (Class A Misdemeanor)

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

The case stemmed from a turbulent breakup where the complainant reported that the client pinched her during two separate encounters, producing photos that showed redness and a small bruise. Police relied heavily on her statements. We obtained the investigative materials and scrutinized the interviews and timeline. At the same time, we built mitigation, including character letters, proof of ongoing education and work, completion of a counseling class, and community service. We presented this to the prosecutor and negotiated straight probation.

Charge

Continuous Violence Against the Family

Location

Hays County, 483rd District Court

Allegations

Police opened a felony continuous family violence case after an ex reported two separate pinching incidents months apart and supplied photos of minor redness. We obtained the full discovery, reviewed the interview recordings and images, and built a clear timeline. Our team pressed on the reliability and sufficiency of the proof and documented that the complaining witness’s cooperation was uncertain. After sustained negotiations and pressure on those evidentiary gaps, the prosecution dismissed the felony case.

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Bastrop County, County Court at Law

Allegations

The client was found sitting in a parked car after an evening at a local venue when an officer illuminated the vehicle and initiated a welfare check. The officer requested field sobriety tests, and our client declined, noting they would not perform well. At the hospital, the officer sought a blood sample, and the paperwork reflected a refusal after unclear advisement. We pursued the body camera footage and scrutinized whether the statutory warnings were properly given and whether the initial detention was lawful. Confronted with these problems, the prosecution agreed to reduce the charge and we secured probation.

Charge

False Report to Induce Emergency Response

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

The case stemmed from a series of calls where our client told authorities a family member was in immediate danger. He was charged with making a false report to trigger an emergency response. We gathered contextual materials, including prior safety complaints and evaluation records, to show he acted out of genuine concern rather than an intent to deceive. We emphasized the state’s burden to prove he knowingly provided false information and pressed those weaknesses in negotiations. The prosecution dismissed the case.

Charge

Criminal Trespass (Misdemeanor)

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

The client was accused of criminal trespass after showing up at a family residence where police said the client had been told not to return. We pulled the case file and spoke with the reporting party to understand what actually happened. The complainant later told us they did not want to pursue the matter. We presented that stance, together with context about the family situation, to the prosecutor. With no complainant support and limited proof, the state dismissed the case.

Charge

Criminal Trespass (Misdemeanor)

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

The client was accused of misdemeanor criminal trespass after a relative reported they entered a residence during a period of apparent intoxication. We moved quickly to understand the dynamics of the situation and contacted the reporting party, who later indicated they did not want to pursue the matter. We presented that position to the prosecutor along with context about the relationship and the circumstances surrounding the incident, emphasizing weaknesses in proving unauthorized entry. The state dismissed the case.