DWI/DUI Case Results in Austin, TX

Real outcomes from real cases. See how we fight for our clients.

Explore AI Summary

CHARGES REDUCED

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

After a two vehicle collision, our client called police to report the accident. At the scene the other driver admitted fault, yet officers focused on alleged intoxication. The client acknowledged drinking earlier and having a prescription medication, completed field tests, and was taken for a hospital blood draw. We scrutinized how the sample was collected and routed to the lab and the reliability of the roadside tests. Leveraging those issues and the fault dispute, we secured a reduction of the charge.

Result

Charges Reduced

May 2026 Attorney: James Fletcher
DEFERRED ADJUDICATION

Charge

DWI (BAC Over .15)

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

A late-night traffic stop for expired registration led to a DWI arrest. The officer noted an alcohol odor and claimed multiple clues on the roadside tests. At the station, hours later, a breath test read just over .15. We obtained body-cam and Intoxilyzer records and challenged the instructions, scoring, and the delay, noting the balance test was performed accurately. Leveraging those issues, we negotiated deferred probation with interlock and classes, avoiding a final conviction if the client completes the terms.

Result

Deferred Adjudication

May 2026 Attorney: Andromeda Vega Rubio
PROBATION

Charge

DWI (BAC Over .15)

Location

Bell County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

Stopped for a lighting issue, the officer reported an odor of marijuana. After roadside tests, the client provided a breath sample at the jail that registered over 0.15. We obtained the dash and body camera video and the breath test maintenance records, then closely examined the basis for the stop and how the tests were conducted. We raised those concerns with the State while documenting the client’s cooperation and steps toward compliance. The case was resolved through a negotiated term of probation, avoiding harsher penalties.

Result

Probation

May 2026 Attorney: Dax Garvin
CHARGES REDUCED

Charge

DWI - Second Offense

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

The client was stopped for not maintaining a single lane after leaving a bar. He admitted to having a few drinks and did roadside tests, noting difficulty on the walk-and-turn and one-leg stand. He refused breath and blood testing, and no sample was ever taken. We secured the dash and body camera recordings, challenged the basis for the stop and the way the tests were administered, and emphasized how steady and coherent he appeared on video. With no BAC and shaky field evidence, we negotiated a reduction to a lesser charge with straight probation.

Result

Charges Reduced

May 2026 Attorney: Dan Dworin
PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Bell County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

After a traffic stop for speeding, officers said they smelled alcohol and had the client perform field sobriety tests, then arrested for DWI. The client refused both breath and blood testing, and no warrant was obtained, so there was no chemical evidence. There was no admission to drinking. We obtained the police reports and discovery, highlighted the lack of objective proof and the subjectivity of the roadside tests, and addressed concerns about licensing and career impact. Using those weaknesses, we secured pre-trial diversion.

Result

Pre-Trial Diversion

May 2026 Attorney: Matthew Pospisil
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

DWI - Second Offense

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

During a traffic stop for speeding, our client was arrested on a second DWI. They refused a breath test, and a blood sample was drawn many hours later. We pulled the dash and body cam footage, which showed the field sobriety tests on a sloped roadside while the client wore heeled boots, and the client appeared clear and coordinated. We emphasized that speeding alone is not proof of intoxication and that the video undercut the officer’s conclusions. We also challenged the ability to tie a delayed blood result to the time of driving. The state dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

May 2026 Attorney: James Fletcher
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Travis County, County Court at Law #7

Allegations

After a minor crash, the client was found outside a running vehicle that had become locked with the keys inside. First responders checked on him, officers arrived, claimed an odor of alcohol, and had him perform field tests. He denied recent drinking and refused both breath and blood testing. We dissected the reports, built a precise timeline showing a gap between any driving and police contact, and challenged proof of operation and intoxication without a chemical result. Faced with those weaknesses, the prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Apr 2026 Attorney: Dan Dworin
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Travis County, County Court at Law, #6

Allegations

Officers found our client asleep in a parked vehicle in a large store parking lot and broke a window to wake them before making a DWI arrest. We secured the police reports and any recordings, then dissected the timeline to show there was no proof of recent driving. We challenged the justification for forcing entry and the reliability of any impairment observations made immediately after a sudden wake-up in a confined space. After sustained negotiations highlighting these evidentiary gaps, the prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Apr 2026 Attorney: Andromeda Vega Rubio
DEFERRED ADJUDICATION

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Bell County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

After a tire blowout caused a single-vehicle incident, officers noticed empty cans and put our client through roadside tests. He explained long-standing balance and respiratory issues, and an officer even remarked on his careful maneuvering to clear traffic. We gathered medical records, tied the crash to mechanical failure, and emphasized his clean history. Leaning on those points, we pressed for an alternative resolution. The state agreed to deferred probation with a class, interlock, and fines, keeping a conviction off his record if he completes the term.

Result

Deferred Adjudication

Apr 2026 Attorney: Dan Dworin
PROBATION

Charge

DWI - Third Offense

Location

Williamson County, 277th DC

Allegations

Police responded after a minor collision and conducted field sobriety tests, then arrested our client for DWI. The client declined breath testing, and a blood sample was later taken under a warrant. With prior DWI history elevating the stakes, we moved quickly to obtain all discovery, scrutinized the reports, video, and the blood-draw paperwork, and assembled mitigation documenting treatment efforts. After persistent negotiations with the prosecution, the case was resolved with straight probation.

Result

Probation

Apr 2026 Attorney: Matthew Pospisil
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Williamson County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

Stopped for an expired registration, the client admitted to having drinks earlier and was asked to perform roadside sobriety tests while wearing heels. She consented to a vehicle search and later provided a breath sample. We scrutinized the officer’s instructions and the testing conditions, arguing the footwear and setup made the results unreliable. In parallel, we secured a pretrial diversion agreement that required classes, monitoring, and community service. The client completed the program, and the prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Apr 2026 Attorney: Andromeda Vega Rubio
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

DWI - First Offense

Location

Milam County, County Court at Law

Allegations

After a traffic stop for speeding, officers noted an open container and arrested our client for DWI. The officer did not conduct standardized field sobriety tests and instead sought a roadside breath test, which the client declined. We pulled patrol and hospital video showing the blood kit was years expired, the wrong tubes were used, and samples from different kits were mixed. We attacked the stop, the collection, and the chain of custody, leaving the state without admissible blood evidence. The prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Apr 2026 Attorney: Dan Dworin

Showing 85-96 of 252 case results

Your Future Can't Wait

Every moment matters when facing criminal charges. Schedule a free case review now.