Criminal Defense Case Results in Hays, TX

Real outcomes from real cases. See how we fight for our clients.

Explore AI Summary

CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Hays County, 453rd District Court

Allegations

The client was on deferred probation when a felony motion to revoke was filed after probation reported two positive alcohol tests and a very high ignition interlock reading. We moved quickly to collect proof of compliance, including completion of a family violence program, significant community service credits, and participation in aftercare. We obtained the lab records and interlock logs to examine timing and context of the results. Armed with that documentation and mitigation, we engaged the prosecutor and probation and argued that revocation was not warranted. The state agreed and dismissed the motion.

Result

Case Dismissed

Nov 2025 Attorney: James Fletcher
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Interference with Public Duties

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law #1

Allegations

During a service attempt at a residence, a dispute escalated and someone called police. Responding officers issued conflicting orders, then arrested the client for interference when the client questioned what to do and tried to explain their role. We obtained bodycam and client-shot video showing mixed commands and no effort to hinder the investigation. We compiled these inconsistencies and challenged whether the elements of the offense were met. The prosecutor dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Hays County, 428th District Court

Allegations

The client was on felony deferred probation when a traffic stop for an equipment issue led to new drug allegations, which the state cited to seek revocation. We closely reviewed the probation terms and the claimed violations, focusing on the legality of the stop and whether consent to search was actually given. We gathered documentation of treatment efforts and meeting attendance to demonstrate progress and compliance. After we highlighted these issues in negotiations, the prosecution dismissed the motion.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Hays County, 428th District Court

Allegations

While on felony probation, the client faced a revocation filing after alleged violations tied to a separate incident. We engaged immediately with community supervision and the prosecutor, secured a fresh substance-use evaluation, and assembled records showing ongoing compliance and progress in treatment. We pushed for an outpatient plan rather than any custodial sanction and asked that punitive action be paused while we supplied documentation. After reviewing our materials, the State backed off and the court dismissed the revocation.

Result

Case Dismissed

Oct 2025 Attorney: James Fletcher
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Unlawful Carrying of a Weapon

Location

Hays County, CC1

Allegations

A late-night traffic stop for alleged swerving led officers to ask about a firearm after noticing a carry license during the ID check. The handgun was secured in the vehicle, then the encounter expanded into a search and an unlawful carrying charge. We obtained the dash and body camera, dissected the basis for the stop, and challenged the scope of the search and how the weapon was found. We also documented the valid license and gaps in proof on the statutory elements. Faced with these issues and our readiness to litigate suppression, the state dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Sep 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
DEFERRED ADJUDICATION

Charge

Resisting Arrest, Search, or Transport

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law no. 3

Allegations

During a traffic stop for alleged moving violations, officers ordered our client to exit the vehicle. He provided identification and chose not to answer further questions. Backup arrived, and while he complied with the order to step out, he was accused of resisting during handcuffing. We obtained and reviewed the bodycam and dashcam, which showed no aggression or attempts to flee, only brief hesitation and confusion. We presented those details and other context to the prosecutor and pushed back on the characterization of resistance. The case was resolved with deferred probation, protecting the client from a conviction if successfully completed.

Result

Deferred Adjudication

Sep 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Misdemeanor Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Hays County, CC3

Allegations

While on misdemeanor deferred probation, the client faced a motion to revoke after a later DWI arrest in another county. He had otherwise followed all terms, and he ultimately completed that other case successfully. We gathered probation records, certificates, and court documents to show full compliance and resolution of the new case, and prepared for a contested hearing. We emphasized that an arrest alone, now resolved, did not justify revocation. The prosecutor dismissed the motion, preventing a conviction.

Result

Case Dismissed

Aug 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CHARGES REDUCED

Charge

Misdemeanor Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law #3

Allegations

While on deferred probation for two misdemeanors, the client was hit with a motion to revoke after a later DWI arrest in another county. We pulled the revocation filings, confirmed there were no missed reports, dirty tests, or other violations, and gathered records showing the DWI was later resolved and completed satisfactorily. We compiled mitigation, including proof of compliance and positive progress, and pressed the State on proportionality. Faced with our package and readiness to contest, the prosecution agreed to scale back the allegations. The case ended with reduced charges and a straight probation resolution.

Result

Charges Reduced

Aug 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Abandoning or Endangering a Child

Location

Hays County, 274th District Court

Allegations

The client was arrested after an incident that led to an allegation of placing a child in danger. We moved quickly to obtain the police reports and discovery and reconstruct the timeline. In negotiations, we challenged whether the evidence actually showed the child faced imminent harm. We also provided mitigation, including proof the client promptly entered treatment and complied with court orders. With those issues on the table, the prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Aug 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Violation of a Protective Order

Location

Hays County, County Court at Law #2

Allegations

After a no-contact order was issued in connection with a prior incident, our client was accused of violating it by allegedly reaching out to the protected person. We obtained the order, reviewed service, and dissected the exact terms to determine what conduct was actually prohibited. We then compared those terms to the state's evidence of contact and identified gaps and inconsistencies in their timeline and proof. We made clear we were ready to litigate those issues. The prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Aug 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence

Location

Hays County, 453rd District Court

Allegations

During a civil service attempt, a dispute drew police, and our client recorded the encounter on a personal camera. Officers later seized the phone and camera and filed a tampering charge, alleging the recordings were altered to impair the investigation. We pulled the full digital files, bodycam, and agency records, verified the footage integrity, and highlighted contradictions in the officers’ accounts, including their failure to search at the scene. After we pressed the state on intent and proof, the prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Aug 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb
CHARGES REDUCED

Charge

Motion to Modify Probation

Location

Hays County, 22nd District Court

Allegations

Our client was on probation with a large community service requirement but suffered severe, documented anaphylaxis and extensive environmental allergies. We compiled ER records, allergy testing, and FMLA paperwork, and showed how attempts to find an indoor, filtered placement had failed. After conferring with probation, which did not oppose a pay-in-lieu arrangement, we presented a focused set of exhibits to the court. The court approved a modification that reduced the obligation and allowed a monetary conversion of the remaining hours. The terms of probation were eased accordingly.

Result

Charges Reduced

Aug 2025 Attorney: Joseph Deeb

Showing 13-24 of 30 case results

Your Future Can't Wait

Every moment matters when facing criminal charges. Schedule a free case review now.