Criminal Defense Case Results in Dallas-Fort Worth, TX

Real outcomes from real cases. See how we fight for our clients.

Explore AI Summary

CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Unlawful Carrying of a Weapon

Location

Dallas County, County Criminal Court No. 9

Allegations

During a late-night traffic stop, officers investigated our client for a separate offense and he disclosed a handgun stored in his vehicle’s console. That admission led to a UCW charge. We pulled the dash and body cam video and compared it to the arrest report, finding inconsistencies in the stated reasons for the stop and in the sequence leading to the discovery of the firearm. We challenged the legality of the detention and the search, and put the state on notice we would move to suppress. Faced with those problems, the prosecutor dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Dec 2025 Attorney: Zach Redington
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Dallas County, 265th Judicial District Court

Allegations

The client was on felony deferred probation when a traffic stop for a broken plate bracket led to a drug paraphernalia citation. Probation filed a motion to revoke and warrants issued. We moved quickly, notified the court, coordinated a plan for surrender and release, and requested the body and dash camera from the stop. We showed the only alleged violation was a minor Class C ticket and that the client had completed fees, classes, and service with only months left. The State withdrew the revocation and the court dismissed it, allowing the client to remain on supervision.

Result

Case Dismissed

Dec 2025 Attorney: Christina King
PROBATION

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Tarrant County, D432

Allegations

While on felony deferred for a collision involving injury, the client was accused of violating probation after a DWI arrest. We obtained the revocation packet and the new case materials, noting the blood draw occurred hours after the stop and came back near the legal limit, and that the resisting allegation was weak. We compiled mitigation about steady employment, school progress, and prior compliance, and pressed the State and probation for an alternative to prison. The initial push for incarceration shifted. The court continued the client on probation with a treatment‑focused sanction instead of revocation.

Result

Probation

Dec 2025 Attorney: Michael Garcia
PROBATION

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Tarrant County, CDC1

Allegations

While on felony deferred probation, a motion to revoke was filed after a new arrest and alleged technical violations. Our team reviewed the case history and assembled mitigation, including proof of recent full-time employment. We engaged the prosecutor, narrowed the allegations to issues that could be addressed without custody, and pushed for continued community supervision. The client entered a limited admission, and the court imposed straight probation with adjusted terms instead of incarceration.

Result

Probation

Dec 2025 Attorney: Michael Garcia
DEFERRED PROBATION

Charge

Sexual Assault of a Minor

Location

Tarrant County, CDC1

Allegations

After an online connection led to an accusation, the client maintained he believed the complainant was older. We launched an independent investigation, retained an investigator to reach the complainant and family, and collected messages showing how age was represented. We organized these materials, challenged credibility issues, and pushed back against early prison offers. With pressure applied and mitigation documented, the state agreed to deferred probation, avoiding prison and keeping a conviction off the record if successfully completed.

Result

Deferred Probation

Dec 2025 Attorney: Michael Garcia
PROBATION

Charge

Felony Motion to Revoke Probation

Location

Tarrant County, CDC1

Allegations

The state filed a motion to revoke the client's felony probation after alleged violations, including a new law allegation. We moved fast to collect favorable records, employment verification, and proof the client was addressing supervision requirements. We opened lines with the probation officer and prosecutor, challenging weaker allegations and proposing targeted modifications. At the hearing we argued rehabilitation outweighed revocation. The court kept the client on straight probation with adjusted terms.

Result

Probation

Dec 2025 Attorney: Michael Garcia
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Abuse of a Corpse

Location

Ellis County, COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 3

Allegations

The client was accused of defacing a gravesite during an ongoing dispute with peers. We obtained the report from a prior incident in which the client's home was vandalized with similar language, and collected screenshots of social media posts showing ongoing taunts and threats. We presented this context to the prosecutor, explaining how it complicated the state's narrative and raised concerns about fairness and proof. After sustained negotiations and review of our materials, the state dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Dec 2025 Attorney: Michael Garcia
DEFERRED PROBATION

Charge

Deadly Conduct (Felony)

Location

Ellis County, 443RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

Allegations

The case stemmed from an allegation that shots were fired toward a residence during a heated dispute. After reviewing the reports and the client’s statements, we anticipated the state would rely heavily on those admissions. We gathered mitigation, including documented social media threats directed at the client, prior vandalism of the client’s home, and video showing a rival pointing a gun at the client on a separate occasion. We presented that context and a plan for counseling and compliance. The prosecution offered deferred probation.

Result

Deferred Probation

Dec 2025 Attorney: Michael Garcia
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Public Intoxication

Location

Tarrant County, Grapevine Municipal Court

Allegations

The client was approached by police in a parking lot outside a nightlife spot after sitting in a parked vehicle. They had briefly started the car and used a personal breathalyzer, then exited the driver’s seat to arrange a sober ride. The client declined to answer questions or perform roadside tests, was arrested for public intoxication, and the vehicle was towed. We obtained and reviewed the patrol videos, which showed no field tests, no admission, and no conduct suggesting danger to self or others. We also raised concerns about the basis for the detention and prepared for trial. The prosecution dismissed the case.

Result

Case Dismissed

Dec 2025 Attorney: Sorsha Huff
CASE DISMISSED

Charge

Assault - Class C

Location

Rockwall County, Heath Municipal Court

Allegations

Police responded to a domestic dispute and, based only on the other party’s account, issued our client a Class C assault citation. No injuries were documented and the officer did not take a full statement from the client, leaving the case built on a single version of events. We got involved immediately, notified the court, and gathered messages and context that showed a volatile, ongoing conflict. The complaining witness later signed an affidavit of non-prosecution, which we provided to the prosecutor. With minimal corroborating evidence, the charge was dismissed.

Result

Case Dismissed

Dec 2025 Attorney: Nelson Knight
PROBATION

Charge

Resisting Arrest

Location

Tarrant County, CCC3

Allegations

During a traffic stop, officers suspected impairment and conducted field tests. When they announced an arrest, the client asked why and hesitated to turn around. Training officers then physically turned the client and added a resisting arrest charge. We dissected the arrest report and emphasized there was no attempt to flee or fight, only brief questioning and a momentary pause. Leveraging the lack of force and intent, we negotiated with the prosecutor. The case resolved with straight probation on the resisting charge, avoiding jail time.

Result

Probation

Dec 2025 Attorney: Michael Garcia
DEFERRED PROBATION

Charge

Public Intoxication

Location

Dallas County, Addison Municipal Court

Allegations

The client was detained at a crowded public event after officers believed they were intoxicated in public. They cooperated throughout and did not escalate the encounter. The client recalled no roadside testing and was only tested at the jail prior to release. We pressed for full discovery, scrutinized the reports, and challenged whether the evidence actually showed a risk to the client or others. With no prior record, we used that leverage to negotiate terms that protected their future. The case resolved with deferred probation, keeping a conviction off the record if completed.

Result

Deferred Probation

Dec 2025 Attorney: Clifford Duke

Showing 73-84 of 247 case results

Your Future Can't Wait

Every moment matters when facing criminal charges. Schedule a free case review now.